Your Health And Tech Friend | Your Health And Food Friend | Your Health And Water Friend | Cover Page | It's All"In The Blog"!



General Index | Index | Internet Highway | Devotional Doorway | Computer Technology | | Home School Hallway | Spiritual Health Walkway | Website Design Hub | Living, Arts, Entertainment | Site Map | Home



Angelina Joli | Medical Mutilation ~~~Nancy ~~~Nancy




Your Health And Tech Friend Magazine





Donations to The Cleveland Courage Fund for Gina, Michelle and Amanda
of Cleveland Ohio. Please help them to recover, with prayers,
and donations if you are able.


Thank you. ~~~Nancy




I'm not a doctor, so what do I know? I don't need a statin drug for my cholesterol, and I've corrected the numbers.



In seven months I've use simple things like olive oil and about a hand full of oil vitamins and have successfully straightened out all of the levels of cholesterol, not just the LDL.


But, what do I know? I'm not a doctor.


Who lopped off' Angelina Jolie's breasts? A medical doctor?

I call it -

medical mutilation,

but, what do I know? I'm not a doctor.


It turns out that I'm not alone in this. I've found so many articles on the internet referencing the same thoughts.

 

"With her breasts removed, she says her risk of breast cancer is now reduced to a mere 5 percent. The same bizarre logic can also be applied to men who cut off their testicles to "prevent testicular cancer" or people who cut out their colons to "prevent colorectal cancer." But that would be insane, so nobody does that, because one of the most basic principles of medicine is that you don't subject patients to the considerable risks and ..."

(See this below ...)

In a New York Times op-ed explaining her decision to have both of her breasts
surgically removed even though she doesn't have breast cancer, Angelina Jolie cited risk numbers as key to her decision. She said that doctors told her she had an "87% risk of breast cancer." Her solution? Undergo three months of surgical procedures and have her breasts cut out.
Problem solved, right? With her breasts removed, she says her risk of breast cancer is now reduced to a mere 5 percent. The same bizarre logic can also be applied to men who cut off their testicles to "prevent testicular cancer" or people who cut out their colons to "prevent colorectal cancer." But that would be insane, so nobody does that, because one of the most basic principles of medicine is that you don't subject patients to the considerable risks and costs of surgery and anesthesia to remove organs that have no disease!
But the really sad part about all this is that Angelina Jolie was lied to. She didn't have an 87% risk of breast cancer in the first place. All the women reading her NYT op-ed piece are also being lied to. Here's why...
How cancer doctors lie with statistics and use fear to scare women into high-profit procedures The very idea that breast cancer is a "percent risk" is a complete lie. In reality, everyone has cancer micro-tumors in their bodies, including myself. Cancer is not a disease you just "get" like being randomly struck by lightning. It's something you must "manage" or "prevent" day by day, meal by meal, through a lifestyle choice that involves vitamin D supplementation, nutrition, superfoods, vegetable juices and avoidance of cancer-causing chemicals and radiation.

 
General Index | Index | Health Topics | Cancer Topics | Technology Topics | Site Map | Home


So when a doctor says you have a "chance" of getting cancer, what he's implying is that you have no control over cancer, and that's an outright lie. Cancer quackery, in other words.
Even Jolie with her BRCA1 gene that's linked to breast cancer can quite easily follow a dietary and lifestyle plan that suppresses BRCA1 gene expression. It's not rocket science. It's not even difficult. It can be done with simple foods that cost a few dollars a day. Those foods include raw citrus, resveratrol (red grapes or red wine), raw cruciferous vegetables, omega-3 oils and much more. Those same foods also help prevent heart disease, diabetes, Alzheimer's and other chronic diseases.
Indole-3-carbinol (I3C), by the way, a natural chemical found in cruciferous vegetables like broccoli and cabbage, offers powerful prevention against BRCA1 gene expression. But you don't hear cancer doctors telling women to "eat more cabbage" because that doesn't make the cancer industry any money. You can buy I3C as a potent nutritional supplement from a variety of sources. It's literally cancer prevention in a capsule.
So the whole "chance" argument is pure quackery. There is no chance involved in whether you get cancer. It's all cause and effect. You are either living a pro-cancer lifestyle and therefore growing cancer, or you're living an anti-cancer lifestyle and keeping cancer in check so that it never becomes a problem. Cause and effect is what results in either the growth of cancer tumors or the prevention of cancer tumors. There is no "luck" involved.
It's fascinating, isn't it, that medical doctors don't believe in luck or voodoo on any topic other than cancer. But when it comes to cancer, they want all women to be suckered into the victim mentality that cancer is purely a matter of "luck" and therefore women have no control over their own health outcomes. How dis-empowering! How sick! How incredibly exploitive of women!
If you really want to be informed about breast cancer and the corrupt, dishonest cancer industry, read my related article 10 Facts about the Breast Cancer Industry You're Not Supposed to Know. Or listen to our upcoming FREE Cancer Solutions Summit broadcasting this coming Monday, May 20th.
Why doesn't the cancer industry empower women with a sense of control over their own health? I find it astonishing that the cancer industry doesn't believe in cause and effect. They would rather scare women with "risk" statistics that imply people have no control over cancer. Empowering women with a sense of control over their own health is the last thing the cancer industry wants to do, because that would cause them to lose customers and lose money. It's far more profitable to scare all women into a state of such irrational panic that they agree to the most insane things imaginable such as chopping off both their healthy breasts even though they have no cancer. Such women are then convinced they've literally saved their own lives by agreeing to be mutilated by cancer surgeons. "My chances of developing breast cancer have dropped from 87 percent to under 5 percent," says Jolie. "I can tell my children that they don't need to fear they will lose me to breast cancer." Will she also tell her children they should mutilate themselves, too, as a form of medical disease prevention? And what happens if she learns she has a risk of brain cancer? Does she chop off her head and call it a cure? The scam of making women believe there is only ONE way to reduce your "risk" of breast cancer The other enormous scam in all this is the idea that there's only one way to reduce your "risk" of breast cancer. Even if you believe the fictitious number of "87% risk," why does everyone automatically assume there is one and only one way to lower that risk? "For any woman reading this, I hope it helps you to know you have options," writes Jolie in the NYT. Yet she utterly fails to offer women any options other than the one she took: check in to a cancer center and let them play "cut-poison-burn" on your body. Jolie's op-ed piece, which reads as if it were written by the public relations department of the Pink Lotus Breast Center, offers nothing in the way of nutrition advice, lifestyle choices, holistic therapies, wellness, alternative medicine... nothing! What an incredible disservice to all the women of America... In the world of health, nutrition and cancer, there are thousands of ways to prevent cancer and suppress the expression of BRCA1 genes. But Jolie and the cancer industry seem to imply no options exist other than chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery. Three options only. Nothing else exists in their world, not nutritional prevention, not vitamin D therapy, not vitamin C potentiated micro-chemotherapy, not ozone therapy, sauna treatments, acupuncture, Chinese herbal medicine, stress reduction or anything else. You are supposed to believe that none of these things exist! And why? Because the cancer industry wants to funnel women like cattle into their slash-poison-burn system of quack treatments. And Angelina Jolie is their new cheerleader. Scarred and no doubt experiencing the chest and armpit numbness that almost always accompanies mastectomy surgery, she now seeks to "inspire" other women to exercise their own sick "choice" and have their breasts removed, too! It is the sickest invocation of women's power that I've ever witnessed. This is not empowering women, it's marching them into self-mutilation. And the "risk" is a complete fraud. In truth, Angelina Jolie had a higher risk of dying on the operating table than dying from breast cancer if she simply followed an anti-cancer lifestyle. Don't be tricked into self-mutilation by cancer industry quacks In summary: The claim that you have a "percent risk" of breast cancer is a big lie which implies you have no control over cancer.
BRCA1 genes can be kept quiet (suppressed) through proper foods and lifestyle choices. A gene is not a death sentence. The implication that there is only ONE way to reduce breast cancer risk is a complete lie. There are thousands of options and strategies for preventing cancer. Never be cornered into surgery by a group of surgeons pushing irrational fear. Cancer micro-tumors exist in everyone. Cancer must be "managed" in everyone to keep it in check and avoid the growth of tumors. The cancer industry tricks women using unethical fear tactics to scare women with false statistics into high-profit cancer procedures that only cause them harm. The claim that cutting off healthy breasts somehow "empowers" women is sick and demented. Women are far more empowered by honest information on nutrition and healthy living that allows them to keep their bodies intact rather than being sliced up by dishonest cancer surgeons. ..." ... continued below ...

 


 
" ...Listen to our FREE cancer solutions seminar on May 20th, as we launch our New Cancer Solutions Healing Summit featuring incredibly valuable lectures by holistic / alternative cancer doctors who know what they're talking about. It's FREE and all women need to be empowered by this truthful information...." Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/040349_Angelina_Jolie_breast_cancer_surgery.html##ixzz2jwMrJuJ5 (Please click through the heading to this full text and source. ~~~ Nancy)


Nancy Koncilja Gurish
Your Health And Tech Friend

My cholesterol numbers are at a wonderful place. In the past seven months, I've used olive oil and a handful of oil vitamins, etc. and my cholesterol numbers were changed for the better. Other levels of my blood work were put into good order. I'm not a doctor, so I can't 'recommend' this method to anyone. Angelina Jolie just had a double mastectomy, in the name of 'preventive medicine' -

on the advice, or at least the consent of a medical provider.

In my thinking - this is mutilation, legal mutilation. Lopping off the breasts, simply on the basis of a gene which was found in Ms. Jolie's dna.

One gene does not, a disease make.

Everyone,

anyone who has information of disease formation knows that, one gene doesn't complete the make-up of a disease.

It takes several genes; many types of genes, and then, environmental factors, and many other factors. I've straightened out my cholesterol numbers... with a few vitamins and some olive oil. I've avoided the use of antibiotics, for about six years in total, with the use of colloidal (ionic) silver that I make myself. I've made ionic copper; and I've used angstrom- sized (liquid) zinc. Among other alternative types of products, I also have and use Miracle Mineral Solution. Oh, and I have a bottle of something called Ormus.

And, I've been called 'extreme' in the ways that I prevent illness and correct 'symptoms' such as cholesterol levels that are 'out of whack.'

I'm called 'extreme.' What do you think

the act of Angelina Jolie's doctor should be called? Modest? How about mutilation...

what about a 'horrendous act'

of ... medical abuse?

That is what I would call it. Simply mad, indeed!
Nancy Koncilja Gurish
P.S. If I were a doctor, perhaps I could or would make a recommendation to anyone who was 'at risk' for cancer; some people are more, at risk, however, I believe

we are all at risk.

I would advise them

to monitor their pH levels. That is about it.

That and, make efforts to use some foods which raise your pH to an alkaline level, and avoid or lessen the foods that lower you pH into the acid range. That is it. That is, all you need. But, I'm not a doctor, what do I know?

____________________
____________________

".... Brad Pitt is calling fiancé Angelina Jolie's decision to have a double mastectomy "absolutely heroic."
 


Colloidal Silver, My Story
Colloidal Silver, Information

 

 

 



Jolie, whose mother died of ovarian cancer in 2007, revealed today (May 14) in a NY Times op-ed that she chose to have the preventative breast cancer surgery to reduce her risk of the disease from 87% to less than 5%. The actress's "World War Z" star beau later gave a statement to the London Evening Standard saying, "Having witnessed this decision first hand, I find Angie's choice, as well as so many others like her, absolutely heroic. I thank our medical team for their care and focus," adding, "All I want is for her to have a long and healthy life, with myself and our children. This is a happy day for our family.
Jolie wrote that she made the decision

after genetic tests revealed she carried a "faulty" gene called BRCA1,

which made her chances of getting both breast and ovarian cancers very high. The three-month process, she revealed, began on February 2 and ended fairly recently on April 27 with re-constructive surgery.
In the piece, Jolie also spoke about Pitt and the support he gave her throughout those three months: "Brad was at the Pink Lotus Breast Center, where I was treated, for every minute of the surgeries. We managed to find moments to laugh together. We knew this was the right thing to do for our family and that it would bring us closer."


....." ____________
________________

 

 

Did anyone inform Angelina and Brad that - breast cancer usually transfers to the brain? Possibly whether or not it is able to appear in the breast~~~

Did anyone tell them that breast cancer can present itself in the small tissue of the chest, (men get breast cancer) - you don't require a large amount of breast tissue to get breast cancer. Did the chances of her cancer drop from 87% to 5% simply on the basis of the mass of tissue available? If so, that is simply nonsense. And this is all in the name of

preventive medicine

. This is the type of medicine, and example of the medicine which is available for a person of financial means, in the country with the greatest medicine available in the world.

What I see is madness! Outrageous, simply ... the most lame,

nonsense of the highest magnitude.

They just don't want to admit that,

they don't know what they are doing

. They just don't know.

 

 


 

 

I'll take my

extreme measures

- taking my pH level, using colloidal (ionic silver) and my other natural substances. Wow,

I'm really extreme, huh?!

 

 


Preface | Note From The Editor | Cover Page | Front Page | Front Page Two | Front Door | Portico | First Floor | Side Door | Sources And Citations | Disclaimer | Gratitude | Appreciation | Public Service Announcements | Site Map

| Disclaimer | Site Map